Tax Matters
A major topic of constitutional abuse concerns taxes. Constitutional government requires revenue, and constitutions provide for revenue collection, but only in certain ways. When taxes are not constitutionally authorized, or are collected in ways that violate constitutional rights, then the foundations of constitutional republican government are threatened.
If money is wanted by Rulers who have in any manner
oppressed the People, they may retain it until their
grievances are redressed, and thus peaceably procure relief,
without trusting to despised petitions or disturbing the
public tranquility. "Continental Congress To The Inhabitants Of The Province Of Quebec", Journals of the Continental Congress 1774-89, Journals 1:105-13 |
Click on the button to get the indicated file format: | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Format | HTML | Text | WP | RTF | Word | Image | |
Local | |||||||
Remote |
U.S. Income Tax The main source of revenue for the U.S. government is the federal income tax, but the legitimacy of the tax and the ways it is collected are doubtful.
Leading Court Decisions read carefully and note their confusion.
Case quotes
"Congress has taxed INCOME, not compensation."
- [Conner v. U.S., 303 F Supp. 1187 (1969)] -
This is just one of MANY rulings where the Federal courts have
consistently, repeatedly, ruled that payment for labor (wages,
salaries and compensation for personal services) is NOT
taxable!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"Income within the meaning of the 16th Amendment and the
Revenue Act means, gain ... and, in such connection, gain
means profit ... proceeding from property severed from
capital, however invested or employed and coming in, received
or drawn by the taxpayer for his separate use, benefit and
disposal."
- [Staples v. U.S., 21 F Supp 737 U.S. Dist. Ct. ED PA, 1937]
-
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"There is a clear distinction
between `profit' and `wages', or a compensation for labor.
Compensation for labor (wages) cannot be regarded as profit
within the meaning of the law. The word profit, as
ordinarily used, means the gain made upon any business or
investment -- a different thing altogether from the mere
compensation for labor."
- [Oliver v. Halstead, 86 S.E. Rep 2nd 85e9 (1955)] -
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"The claim that salaries,
wages, and compensation for personal services are to be
taxed as an entirety and therefore must be returned by the
individual who has performed the services which produce the
gain is without support, either in the language of the Act
or in the decisions of the courts construing it. Not only
this, but it is directly opposed to provisions of the Act
and to regulations of the U.S. Treasury Department, which
either prescribed or permits that compensations for personal
services not be taxed as a entirety and not be returned by
the individual performing the services. It is to be noted
that, by the language of the Act, it is not salaries, wages,
or compensation for personal services that are to be
included in gains, profits, and income derived from
salaries, wages, or compensation for personal services." -
[Lucas v. Earl, 281 U.S. 111 (1930)] -
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"... whatever may constitute
income, therefore, must have the essential feature of gain
to the recipient. This was true when the 16th Amendment
became effective, it was true at the time of Eisner v.
Macomber Supra, it was true under Section 22(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1938, and it is likewise true under
Section 61(a) of the I.R.S. Code of 1954. If there is not
gain, there is not income ... Congress has taxed income not
compensation." [Conner v. U.S., 303 F Supp. 1187 (1969)] -
---------------------------------------------------------------------
A much earlier ruling stated very simply: "... one does not
derive income by rendering services and charging for them."
- [Edwards v. Keith, 231 F 111 (1916)] -
---------------------------------------------------------------------
State court rulings coincide
with the Federal courts. "... reasonable compensation for
labor or services rendered is not profit." - [Lauderdale
Cemetery Assoc. v. Mathews, 345 PA 239; 47 A. 2d 277, 280
(1946)] -
"There is a clear distinction between profit and wages, or
compensation for labor. Compensation for labor cannot be
regarded as profit within the meaning of the law."
- [Oliver v. Halstead, 196 VA 992; 86 S.E. 2d 858 (1955)] -
Direct and Indirect taxes Discussion and examploes.
U.S. Social Security The main system of federal retirement subsidy.
Also see Money Matters.
Home | |
Original URL: http://constitution.famguardian.org/1-Activism/cs_taxes.htm
Maintained: Constitution Research |