Landmark U.S. Supreme Court Decisions
Click on the
button to get the indicated file format: |
HTML |
Text |
WP |
PDF |
RTF |
Spread |
Image |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/891f2/891f23d687250f481b59f7d8dadcb6044929dff8" alt="HTML Version or Menu" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac4f8/ac4f845634c368a6cee3375f0140c931fc8e0c02" alt="Text Version" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6efa9/6efa9be13f03d2ac696f76cb5b5c7a5d2c87b536" alt="Zipped WordPerfect" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07a52/07a52bdce459fa0a8ed8ebe67462e1c0c1104d84" alt="Adobe PDF" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a212/8a212535b2b2c8142758e84d019de0676850291d" alt="RTF" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/011b7/011b75c6b80054a671425f2d7733ce61cd2479e5" alt="MS Word Version" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/987d9/987d91b5383494c8a8cf9dbfa45221cd4429236d" alt="Graphic Image" |
|
Rating |
Wrong |
Correct |
Mixed |
Decision |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd97/cfd978e60431b0b7ec79614eeef181a75b067731" alt="Wrong decision" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de700/de7004beaed15a20086ec3852a8bf632451716d5" alt="Correct decision" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3cdc/b3cdcca8c4dde269e211f7694b2b6b09320f9126" alt="Mixed decision" |
Opinion |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca8c3/ca8c33fbd551318a43f3db499eb6f8dd337859b1" alt="Bad opinion" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3da1/e3da1c3680c075777a86341424ffe2ea15ece808" alt="Good opinion" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6731d/6731d974e5ffa21576a4a31fd76cee171d585874" alt="Mixed opinion" |
|
Georgia v.
Brailsford, 3 U.S. 1 (Dall.) (1794) — Jury has power to judge law in
bringing general verdict.
Opinion —
John Jay
Commentary — Jon Roland
Calder v.
Bull, 3 U.S. 386 (Dall.) (1798) — Supreme Court has jurisdiction to
overrule unconstitutional state legislation, such as ex post facto laws.
Opinion —
Chase, Paterson, Iredell, Cushing
Commentary — Jon Roland
Marbury v.
Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137; 2 L. Ed. 60 (1803) — Courts must not
sustain unconstitutional acts of government.
Opinion —
John Marshall, Chase, Paterson, Washington
Commentary — Jon Roland
U.S. v.
Burr, 8 U.S. (4 Cranch) 469 (1807) — Established standards of evidence
for treason.
United States
v. Hudson, 7 Cranch 32 (1812) — Courts have no jurisdiction over
common law crimes.
Opinion —
Johnson
Commentary — Jon Roland
McCulloch v.
Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819) — National Bank was tax-exempt federal
agency.
Syllabus
Opinion —
John Marshall
Commentary — Jon Roland
Gibbons v.
Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824) — State may not grant exclusive navigation
license for its coastal waters.
Opinion —
John Marshall, Concurring Johnson, J.
Commentary — Jon Roland
Barron v. Mayor
& City Council of Baltimore, 32 U.S. 243 (1833) — Federal courts
do not have jurisdiction in cases in which a citizen sues his state for
violation of any of the Bill of Rights.
Syllabus
Opinion —
John Marshall
Commentary — Jon Roland
Games v.
Stiles ex dem Dunn, 39 U.S. 322 (1840) — If the bench and jury
disagree on a point of law, the opinion of the bench prevails.
Opinion —
John M'Lean
Commentary — Jon Roland
Ex Parte
Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (4 Wall.) (1866) — Civilians may not be tried by
military tribunals.
Opinion —
Davis
Partial Dissent —
Salmon P. Chase
Commentary — Jon Roland
Ex Parte
McCardle, 74 U.S. 506 (Wall.) (1868) — Congress may remove
jurisdiction from the Supreme Court.
Opinion —
Salmon P. Chase
Commentary — Jon Roland
U. S. v.
Hall, 98 U.S. 343 (1878) — Congress may prohibit embezzlement of
pension payments, enforceable by deprivation of liberty.
Opinion —
Clifford
Commentary — Jon Roland
Hurtado v.
California, 110 U.S. 516 (1884) — States not required to indict by
grand jury.
Opinion —
Matthews
Dissenting —
Harlan
Commentary — Jon Roland
Logan v.
U.S., 144 U.S. 263 (1892) — Congress may prohibit injury or death of
persons in custody of U.S. officials, caused by any person, enforceable by
deprivation of life or liberty.
Opinion —
Gray
Commentary — Jon Roland
Sparf &
Hansen v. United States, 156 U.S. 51, 64 (1895) — Jurors do not need
to be informed of their power to judge the law in bringing a general verdict.
Syllabus
Opinion —
John M. Harlan, Jackson
Dissenting —
David J. Brewer, Brown
Dissenting —
Horace Gray, Shiras
Commentary — Jon Roland
Coffin v.
U.S., 156 U.S. 432 (1895) — Court must instruct jury in criminal case
that accused is presumed innocent.
Opinion —
White
Commentary — Jon Roland
Lochner v.
New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905) — State statute restricting hours of work
is a violation of due-process protection of 14th Amendment.
Opinion —
Peckham
Dissenting —
Harlan, Holmes
Commentary — Jon Roland
Twining v. New
Jersey, 211 U.S. 78 (1908) — State not required to protect right
against self-incrimination.
Opinion —
Moody
Dissenting —
Harlan
Commentary — Jon Roland
Connally v.
General Const. Co., 269 U.S. 385 (1926) — State statute void for
vagueness.
Opinion —
Sutherland
Commentary — Jon Roland
Palko v.
Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319 (1937) — State not required to protect right
against double jeopardy.
Opinion —
Cardozo
Commentary — Jon Roland
Ex Parte
Quirin, 317 U.S. 1 (1942) — Foreign infiltrators onto U.S. territory
may be tried for espionage and sabotage by a military tribunal.
Opinion —
Stone
Commentary —
Jon Roland
Murdock v.
Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943) — A state may not impose a tax or
charge on the dissemination of religious literature.
Opinion —
Douglas
Opinion —
Reed, Frankfurter, Jackson
Commentary — Jon Roland
U.S. v.
Lovett, 328 U.S. 303 (1946) — Legislative denial of compensation based
on political views is a prohibited bill of attainder.
Opinion —
Black, Frankfurter
Commentary — Jon Roland
Adamson v.
California, 332 U.S. 46 (1947) — Decision of an accused not to testify
may be used against him in a state criminal trial.
Opinion —
Reed
Concurring —
Frankfurter
Dissenting —
Black
Commentary — Jon Roland
Reid v.
Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957) — Treaties do not confer powers not
authorized by Constitution, and in particular, over civilians outside U.S.
territory.
Opinion —
Black
Concurring —
Frankfurter, Harlan
Dissenting —
Clark
Commentary — Jon Roland
Gideon v.
Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963) — State required to provide defense
counsel to accused unable to hire his own.
Opinion —
Black, Douglas, Clark, Harlan
Commentary — Jon Roland
Camara v.
Municipal Court, 387 U.S. 523 (1967) — Building inspector must obtain
warrant to inspect building if owner does not consent to it.
Opinions —
White, and others
Commentary — Jon Roland
Buckley v.
Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976) — Campaign spending may not be limited, but
contributions may be, and the identity of contributors may be required to be
disclosed, and anonymous contributors prohibited.
Opinion —
Brennan, Stewart, Powell
Commentary — Jon Roland
Lewis v. United
States, 445 U.S. 55 (1980) — Person who has been convicted of a crime
in a state court may be convicted of a federal crime for possession of
firearms.
Syllabus
Opinion —
Blackmun, J., Berger, Stewart, White, Rehnquist,
Stevens
Dissenting —
Brennan, J., Marshall, Powell
Commentary — Jon Roland
Brown v.
Socialist Workers', 459 U.S. 87 (1982) — Minor party which has
historically been harassed is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.
Opinion —
Marshall
Commentary — Jon Roland
Hafer v.
Melo, 502 U.S. 21 (1991) — State officers may be held personally
liable for damages based upon actions taken in their official capacities.
Opinion —
O'Connor
Commentary — Jon Roland
Soldal v.
Cook County, 506 U.S. 56 (1992) — State or local officials who stand
by or protect an unlawful eviction or seizure are liable for damages under 42
USC 1983.
Opinions —
White, and others
Commentary — Jon Roland
Staples v.
United States, 511 U.S. 600 (1994) — Government must prove beyond a
reasonable doubt that defendant knew that his rifle had the characteristics
that brought it within the statutory definition of a machinegun.
Opinion —
Thomas
Commentary — Jon Roland
McIntyre v.
Ohio Elections Comm'n, 514 U.S. 334 (1995) — Advocacy publication may
be anonymous, and is exempt from campaign disclosure statute.
Opinion —
Stevens, Concurring Ginsburg
Concurring —
Thomas
Dissenting —
Scalia, Rehnquist
Commentary — Jon Roland
United States
v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995) — Prohibition against possessing firearm
in proximity of a school is not authorized as connected to interstate commerce.
Syllabus
Opinion —
Rehnquist, Kennedy, O'Connor, Scalia,
Thomas
Concurring —
Kennedy, O'Connor
Concurring —
Thomas
Bennis v.
Michigan, 517 U.S. 1163 (1996) — Property used in a crime may be
forfeited even though partly or wholly owned by an innocent third party.
Opinions —
Rehnquist, and others
Commentary — Jon Roland
Commentary — Graeme S. R.
Brown
Caron v. United
States, 524 U.S. 308 (1998) — Even if a State permitted an offender to
have the guns he possessed, federal law may use the States determination
that the offender is more dangerous than law-abiding citizens to impose its own
felony conviction.
Syllabus
Opinion —
Kennedy, Rehnquist, Stevens, OConnor, Ginsburg,
Breyer
Dissenting —
Thomas, Scalia, Suter
Commentary — Jon Roland
Saenz v.
Roe, Docket 98-97 (Decided May 17, 1999) — State may not deny benefits
to new arrivals.
Syllabus
Opinion —
Stevens, OConnor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter,
Ginsburg, Breyer
Dissenting —
Rehnquist, Thomas
Dissenting —
Thomas, Rehnquist
Commentary — Jon Roland
United States
v. Morrison, Docket 99-5 (Decided May 15, 2000) — Congress lacked
authority to enact a law which provides a federal civil remedy for the victims
of gender-motivated violence.
Syllabus
Opinion —
Rehnquist, OConnor, Scalia, Kennedy,
and Thomas
Concurring —
Thomas
Dissenting —
Souter, Stevens, Ginsburg, and Breyer
Dissenting —
Breyer, Stevens; Souter and Ginsburg joined on I-A
Jones v.
United States, Docket 99-5739 (Decided May 22, 2000) — An
owner-occupied residence not used for any commercial purpose does not qualify
as property used in commerce or commerce-affecting activity, so
arson of such a dwelling is not subject to federal prosecution.
Syllabus
Opinion —
Ginsburg, for unanimous court
Concurring —
Stevens, Thomas
Concurring —
Thomas, Scalia
Commentary — Jon Roland
Palazzolo v.
Rhode Island, Docket 99-2047 (Decided Jun. 28, 2001) — A state
land-use regulation may present standing to a subsequent owner for compensation
under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
Opinions —
Kennedy, and others
Commentary — Jon Roland
Spreadsheet of U.S. Supreme Court Milestones
— Trace the evolution of departures from compliance with original understanding. (Open Document Standard format of first button needed to get the hyperlinks to the opinions and commentaries, but may not be compatible with MS Excel. A tool that supports the Open Document Standard is OpenOffice.org, which provides comparable functionality to the MS Office suite of tools, but is free.)
Sources for Supreme Court Cases
US Supreme Court Cases — Opinions from Justia & Oyez.
US Supreme Court Opinions — Findlaw.
US Supreme Court Collection — Cornell.